Psychology and psychosocial.Kohlberg's Heinz moral dilemma response. word 2007.

Answers to Kohlbergs well k nary(prenominal)n Heinz plight some money or purport. Answers are in word 2007 format. In Europe, a fair(a) sex was near death from cancer. One medicine cogency besides her, a form of radium that a chemist in the same town had recently discovered. The druggist was charging $2000, cardinal clock what the drug had cost him to make. The sick womans husband, Heinz, went to everyone he knew to scoop out the money, ut he could get together only somewhat half(prenominal) of what it should cost. He told the druggist that his wife was dying and asked him to sell it cheaper or to let him pay later. But the druggist said no. The husband got desperate and broke into the mans store to steal the drug for his wife. Should the husband have done that? Why?The reasons Yes and No resolving powers I think that Heinz should steal the drug based on Kohlberg?s well known story of a incorrupt dilemma involving morals of man for another person?s support; My ?YES? and ?NO? answers are based on altogether(prenominal) of the 3 levels fit in Kohlberg?s theory of moral ratiocination, preconventional, conventional, and postconventional level of moral reasoning. My answer varies on what position I put in and I can answer ?YES? or ?NO? in all the situations based on all three levels of Kohlberg?s morality. 1.

showtime be sure to carefully re-read the section on Kohlberg, pages 222 to 225 in our text by Griggs. 2. Study and think about the Heinz exercising described on pages 222 to 225 (Richard A Griggs). Then rise to envisage the reasoning for saying ?YES, Heinz should steal the drug? for each of the 3 levels of moral reasoning, Pr! econventional, Conventional, and Postconventional. Then try to imagine the reasoning for saying ?NO, Heinz should not... If you want to get a full essay, regulate it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay